System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The end of open source?: Regulating open source under the cyber resilience act and the new product liability directive
Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law, The Swedish Law and Informatics Research Institute.
2025 (English)In: The Computer Law and Security Review, ISSN 0267-3649, Vol. 56, article id 106105Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Rooted in idealism, the open-source model leverages collaborative intelligence to drive innovation, leading to major benefits for both industry and society. As open-source software (OSS) plays an increasingly central role in driving the digitalization of society, policymakers are examining the interactions between upstream open-source communities and downstream manufacturers. They aim to leverage the benefits of OSS, such as performance enhancements and adaptability across diverse domains, while ensuring software security and accountability. The regulatory landscape is on the brink of a major transformation with the recent adoption of both the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) as well as the Product Liability Directive (PLD), raising concerns that these laws could threaten the future of OSS.

This paper investigates how the CRA and the PDL regulate OSS, specifically exploring the scope of exemptions found in the laws. It further explores how OSS practices might adapt to the evolving regulatory landscape, focusing on the importance of documentation practices to support compliance obligations, thereby ensuring OSS's continued relevance and viability. It concludes that due diligence requirements mandate a thorough assessment of OSS components to ensure their safety for integration into commercial products and services. Documentation practices like security attestations, Software Bill of Materials (SBOMs), data cards and model cards will play an increasingly important role in the software supply chain to ensure that downstream entities can meet their obligations under these new legal frameworks.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. Vol. 56, article id 106105
National Category
Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-239444DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106105ISI: 001421263800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85213216046OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-239444DiVA, id: diva2:1936864
Funder
Wallenberg FoundationsAvailable from: 2025-02-12 Created: 2025-02-12 Last updated: 2025-10-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Colonna, Liane

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Colonna, Liane
By organisation
The Swedish Law and Informatics Research Institute
In the same journal
The Computer Law and Security Review
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 253 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf