Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Socioeconomic Status, Need Fulfillment, and Subjective Well-Being
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, The Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4436-1559
Number of Authors: 22025 (English)In: Journal of Happiness Studies, ISSN 1389-4978, E-ISSN 1573-7780, Vol. 26, no 6, article id 108Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Based on a cross-disciplinary theoretical framework, this study investigates the relation­ships between multiple components of socioeconomic status (income, occupation, and ed­ucation), basic need fulfillment (autonomy, competence, relatedness, security, and respect), and subjective well-being (life satisfaction and emotional well-being). Using high-quality Swedish survey data, we applied Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. To address potential mood bias, we measured socioeconomic status, need ful­fillment, and subjective well-being at different time points, reflecting the theorized sequen­tial order of these constructs. Empirically, household income stood out as the strongest socioeconomic predictor of both need fulfillment and subjective well-being. However, higher occupational status was also positively associated with multiple types of need ful­fillment and with greater subjective well-being. Educational level, by comparison, was linked only to greater fulfillment of competence in multivariate analyses. All five needs were positively associated with subjective well-being in bivariate analyses; however, only the fulfillment of autonomy and security remained significant predictors and mediators of the relationship between socioeconomic status and subjective well-being in structural equation models. The findings underscore the substantial influence of income, the addi­tional benefits of occupational status, and the importance of autonomy and security needs in understanding subjective well-being and its socioeconomic gradient.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. Vol. 26, no 6, article id 108
Keywords [en]
Subjective Well-Being, Need Fulfillment, Socioeconomic Status, Structural Equation Modeling, European Social Survey, ESS CRONOS-2
National Category
Sociology (Excluding Social Work, Social Anthropology, Demography and Criminology)
Research subject
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-245303DOI: 10.1007/s10902-025-00939-8ISI: 001542753500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105012624364OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-245303DiVA, id: diva2:1986880
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2020-00963Available from: 2025-08-04 Created: 2025-08-04 Last updated: 2025-08-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Lindh, Arvid

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fors Connolly, FilipLindh, Arvid
By organisation
The Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI)
In the same journal
Journal of Happiness Studies
Sociology (Excluding Social Work, Social Anthropology, Demography and Criminology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 16 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf