Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Inter- and transdisciplinary knowledge is critical for nature-based solutions to contribute to just urban transformations
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre. The New School, New York; Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9499-0791
Number of Authors: 42025 (English)In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, ISSN 0027-8424, E-ISSN 1091-6490, Vol. 122, no 29, article id e2315911121Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Nature-based solutions (NBS) are used to transform existing unsustainable and undesirable path dependencies in cities. For NBS to contribute to just urban transformations, a stronger inter- and transdisciplinary knowledge base is needed. This knowledge base is essential to engage with six complex yet crucial questions about NBS, including “for what?,” “which nature?,” “where?,” “how?,” “when,” and “for whom?.” To address these questions, we identify two critical opportunities to advance the knowledge of NBS. First, we argue for solidifying interdisciplinary approaches to examine how NBS can be designed, planned, and implemented for multifunctionality. Second, we argue that researchers need to work transdisciplinarily with diverse stakeholders to ensure the design, siting, and planning of NBS are appropriate to the context. In both critical opportunities, justice should be a core guiding principle from the beginning of planning the NBS, starting with the foundational understanding that NBS are not inherently just or unjust. Instead, their value depends on a holistic examination of the context in which they operate and the institutional logic that guides their planning. To center justice in the inter- and transdisciplinary research and practice of NBS, a knowledge shift from epistemological injustice to epistemological inclusivity is a critical way forward.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. Vol. 122, no 29, article id e2315911121
Keywords [en]
epistemology, interdisciplinarity, just transformations, transdisciplinary, Urban
National Category
Human Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-245698DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2315911121ISI: 001538205800001PubMedID: 40658852Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105011490132OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-245698DiVA, id: diva2:1990627
Available from: 2025-08-20 Created: 2025-08-20 Last updated: 2025-10-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

McPhearson, Timon

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
McPhearson, Timon
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Human Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 16 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf