Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Catalyzing change: a literature review on the implementation of the Nature Futures Framework
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6655-9355
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 102025 (English)In: Sustainability Science, ISSN 1862-4065, E-ISSN 1862-4057Article, review/survey (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

The Nature Futures Framework (NFF), developed under the Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), serves as a catalyst for advancing new scenarios and models focused on biodiversity and ecosystem services within the broader research community. In particular, the framework facilitates the development of scenarios and models that can help guide change processes toward desirable futures for nature and people. This paper assesses 31 studies that have engaged with the NFF since its introduction in 2020, aiming to identify which research areas have been addressed, and where development needs remain. The applications exhibit a large diversity in terms of locations, spatial scales, methods, outputs, and stakeholder involvement. The most common use of the framework has been in developing visions and scenarios. Nearly all studies engaged with diverse values of nature through the framework’s fundamental value perspectives: ‘Nature for Society’, ‘Nature for Nature’, and ‘Nature as Culture/One with Nature’. While the framework is generally perceived as useful, challenges remain in integrating the NFF across multiple scales and fully incorporating plural values, particularly in measuring relational aspects and avoiding Western-centric biases. Future research priorities include developing integrated, quantitative studies and exploring transformative pathways to enhance the framework's effectiveness in driving sustainable outcomes. Overall, the growing body of work using the NFF provides a strong foundation for distilling best practices, facilitating large-scale applications, and achieving the framework's objectives.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025.
Keywords [en]
IPBES, Models, Scenarios, Transformative change, Value plurality, Visions
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-246315DOI: 10.1007/s11625-025-01682-yISI: 001518287100001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105009325035OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-246315DiVA, id: diva2:1993792
Available from: 2025-09-01 Created: 2025-09-01 Last updated: 2025-09-01

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Kuiper, Jan J.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kuiper, Jan J.
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Sustainability Science
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 27 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf