Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Navigating industrial policy and global value chains in an era of disruptions
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Business School, Management & Organisation.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6668-1190
Number of Authors: 42025 (English)In: Journal of International Business Policy, ISSN 2522-0691, Vol. 8, p. 207-223Article in journal, Editorial material (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In response to recent socio-economic, environmental, and geopolitical disruptions, governments have reoriented industrial policy from a prosperity-driven to a security-driven agenda based on strengthening strategic supply chains. We provide a framework that integrates the industrial policy and global value chain (GVC) literatures, redressing two research gaps: (1) an outdated view of industrial policy based on twentieth century trade patterns; and (2) inadequate appreciation of how twenty-first century GVC dynamics shape new security-driven policies. Four strategic orientations in industrial policy are identified based on two dimensions: level of economic development (advanced versus emerging economies) and geopolitical context (global integration versus geopolitical fragmentation). Under global integration, (1) advanced economies “create winners” through inside-out policies transforming domestic champions into global competitors; and (2) emerging economies “enable latecomer catch-up” via outside-in strategies leveraging foreign investment for technological accumulation. Under geopolitical fragmentation, (3) advanced economies “enhance economic security” through restrictive outside-in policies prioritizing domestic resilience; and (4) emerging economies “strengthen supplier resilience” with hybrid approaches that maintain global connections while reducing strategic vulnerabilities. We apply this framework to articles in this special issue on five cross-cutting themes: disruptions and resilience; GVC configurations; tensions and trade-offs; new drivers of industrial policy; and data and policy insights.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. Vol. 8, p. 207-223
Keywords [en]
Economic nationalism, Geopolitical fragmentation, GVC configurations, GVC governance, GVC upgrading, Policy trade-offs, Reshoring, Resilience
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-247086DOI: 10.1057/s42214-025-00223-9ISI: 001545972200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105012766750OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-247086DiVA, id: diva2:2000907
Available from: 2025-09-25 Created: 2025-09-25 Last updated: 2025-11-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Fang, Tony

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fang, Tony
By organisation
Management & Organisation
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 11 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf