Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fly pollinator foraging in boreal forests is shaped by climate, forest structure and flower resources
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 72025 (English)In: Oikos, ISSN 0030-1299, E-ISSN 1600-0706Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Most insect pollinators are ectothermic and rely on external heat sources for temperature regulation. Forests, with their diverse canopy structures and sunlight penetration levels, create a mosaic of microclimates influencing these insects' behaviour. This study examined how macro- and microclimatic temperatures, precipitation, forest structure, and flower resources affect pollinator activity in the understory of two Swedish mixed forests using a combination of artificial flower stations, time-lapse pictures, and high-resolution climate data. Diptera was the most abundant order of flower visitors, with Muscidae, Phoridae and Syrphidae being the most recorded families. Our results show that macroclimate was the main driver of flower visitation rates, while microclimatic conditions better predicted foraging time. Based on our models, forest fly pollinators increase their flower visitation rates within a narrow temperature window. Thus, we anticipate that the effects of rising temperatures due to climate change on flower visitation rates by insects will largely depend on baseline temperature. Additionally, temperature appears more important than changes in other macroclimatic variables such as rain. Precipitation reduced pollinator visits, and pollinators increased their activity with time since the last rainfall. Forest density negatively impacted pollinator presence, with effects varying by pollinator group and species, but suggesting that increasing canopy openness could enhance pollinator habitats and support biodiversity. Higher flower species richness decreased visitation rates but extended pollinator foraging time in some cases. Conversely, abundant wildflowers increased pollinator visitation rates but reduced their overall foraging time, probably due to competition. Our study highlights the complex relationships that occur between forest structure, climate, flower resources, and pollinator activity. Understanding species-specific responses to forest composition and understory vegetation can guide tree species selection in afforestation or reforestation projects to support diverse pollinator communities, ultimately informing effective conservation and forest management practices to maintain healthy pollinator populations and ecosystem resilience under a changing climate.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025.
Keywords [en]
Canopy openness, climate change, climatic refugia, Convolutional Neural Network, deep learning, diptera, forest composition, pollinator conservation, YOLOv5
National Category
Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-247979DOI: 10.1002/oik.11405Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105017077705OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-247979DiVA, id: diva2:2005126
Available from: 2025-10-09 Created: 2025-10-09 Last updated: 2025-10-09

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Cousins, Sara A. O.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cousins, Sara A. O.
By organisation
Department of Physical Geography
In the same journal
Oikos
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 6 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf