Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Moving from fit to fitness for governing water in the Anthropocene
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre. University of Victoria, Canada.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8837-524x
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre. Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, The Bolin Centre for Climate Research (together with KTH & SMHI). The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden; Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7739-5069
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8218-1153
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre. University of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6300-0572
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Nature Water, E-ISSN 2731-6084, Vol. 2, no 6, p. 511-520Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We bring together two decades of research on cross-scale spatial and temporal connectivity of water in the Anthropocene to understand the implications for institutional fit and water governance, with a focus on river basin organizations and watershed-based bodies. There is strong evidence showing how hydrological cycles are tightly coupled across larger spatial scales than they were in the past, which implies a possible expansion of the boundaries typically considered in the study and governance of water. Temporally, frequent time lags between action and consequence and the potential for increasing concurrence of extreme events pose risks for decision-makers trying to make accurate and appropriate decisions. Both cross-scale spatial and temporal connectivity create new challenges to key principles regarding participation, deliberation and collaboration in water governance. We argue for a shift from emphasizing how governance can ‘fit’ a closed, biophysical boundary towards a stronger consideration of institutional ‘fitness’ through flexibility, responsiveness and anticipatory capacity to better support water resilience and sustainability.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 2, no 6, p. 511-520
National Category
Oceanography, Hydrology and Water Resources Environmental Economics and Management
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-250161DOI: 10.1038/s44221-024-00257-yISI: 001390098100013Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85204256123OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-250161DiVA, id: diva2:2018839
Available from: 2025-12-04 Created: 2025-12-04 Last updated: 2025-12-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Moore, Michele-LeeWang-Erlandsson, LanBodin, ÖrjanEnqvist, JohanJaramillo, FernandoFolke, CarlLade, Steven J.Mancilla García, MaríaMartin, RominaPranindita, AgnesRocha, Juan C.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Moore, Michele-LeeWang-Erlandsson, LanBodin, ÖrjanEnqvist, JohanJaramillo, FernandoFolke, CarlLade, Steven J.Mancilla García, MaríaMartin, RominaPranindita, AgnesRocha, Juan C.
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience CentreThe Bolin Centre for Climate Research (together with KTH & SMHI)Department of Physical Geography
In the same journal
Nature Water
Oceanography, Hydrology and Water ResourcesEnvironmental Economics and Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 13 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf