Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A review of initiatives to transform the global sand system
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre.ORCID iD: 0009-0009-4053-5708
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8979-2379
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6655-9355
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre. The University of British Columbia, Canada; Stanford University, USA.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5076-9163
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 52026 (English)In: Ecology and Society, E-ISSN 1708-3087, Vol. 31, no 1, article id 24Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Sand is the most consumed commodity on Earth. Yet its extraction is inherently unsustainable because of key factors such as its non-renewable nature and the lack of readily available substitutes in the current industrial milieu. Indiscriminate sand extraction has severe consequences for ecosystems and the people who depend on them. Despite increased attention over the past few years from the academic community, much of the existing sand literature remains problem-oriented and focused on sand supply, limiting our ability to envision and implement sustainable alternatives. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review, focusing on solutions to the sand crisis within the scientific literature. We identified 266 articles that shed light on alternative materials, and innovative practices within the built environment. Our findings reveal a diverse array of promising initiatives, classified as “sand seeds,” which have the potential to significantly reduce the environmental impact of sand extraction while supporting economic and social benefits. However, the literature also highlights challenges in scaling these solutions and integrating them into mainstream practices to achieve transformative change. Identifying and assessing these seeds offers a foundation for scholars and policy makers to propose and implement sustainable alternatives to current sand extraction practices. Future research should adopt participatory and transdisciplinary approaches to examine how these seeds are influenced by the funding landscape, synergies across sectors, or competing uses that could influence material choices in the built environment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2026. Vol. 31, no 1, article id 24
Keywords [en]
alternative materials, bio-based building materials, built environment, circular economy, regenerative design, sand seeds, sustainability
National Category
Building materials
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-253239DOI: 10.5751/ES-16890-310124ISI: 001696121100002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105031173918OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-253239DiVA, id: diva2:2045324
Available from: 2026-03-12 Created: 2026-03-12 Last updated: 2026-03-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Pereira, KiranBarbour, FelixKuiper, Jan J.Wabnitz, Colette C. C.Jouffray, Jean-Baptiste

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pereira, KiranBarbour, FelixKuiper, Jan J.Wabnitz, Colette C. C.Jouffray, Jean-Baptiste
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Ecology and Society
Building materials

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 19 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf