Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Potentials and challenges of digital assessment: University teachers’ perceptions
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4731-116x
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9867-6399
Number of Authors: 32025 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Assessment practices in higher education are undergoing significant changes due to the broader trend of digitisation and the challenges posed by students' access to AI chatbots, such as ChatGPT. At the same time, the challenges aim to ensure authenticity and higher order 'thinking skills' in assessment practices. This presentation is part of an ongoing study and its main aim is to contribute to knowledge about university teachers' experiences of opportunities and challenges in conducting assessment practices in the new media age. The aim is framed by theories of epistemic cultures and cultures of recognition (Knorr Cetina, 2007; Kress & Selander, 2012), which are used to explore the understanding of specific knowledge domains for assessment within courses and faculties. This part of the study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with eight different university teachers in three different faculties and three different professional programmes in higher education in Sweden. The results are reported at four levels: university level, faculty/programme level, course level and teacher/student level. The preliminary results indicate that teachers' choices in designing assessment tasks are influenced both by established assessment traditions - especially in digital assessment of subject knowledge - and a certain awareness of how different digital formats can represent the knowledge to be assessed. Teachers interviewed are sometimes constrained in their assessment design by shortcomings at university level, such as the number of places in common examination rooms, different rules and long lead times. At course level there are clear expressions of a common view of knowledge. At teacher level, there is an openness to try new forms of assessment and to vary the forms of assessment more, and that their own development is needed when it comes to AI.

Keywords: Digital assessment, epistemic cultures, higher education

Knorr Cetina, K. (2007). Culture in global knowledge societies: Knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32:4, 361-375.

 Kress, G. & Selander, S. (2012). Multimodal design, learning and cultures of recognition. The Internet and Higher Education, 15 (4), 265–268.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025.
Keywords [en]
Digital assessment, epistemic cultures, higher education
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-253934OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-253934DiVA, id: diva2:2050178
Conference
FOE 2025 | The Future of Education 15th Edition, International Conference, 25–27 June, 2025, Florence, Italy.
Available from: 2026-04-01 Created: 2026-04-01 Last updated: 2026-04-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Edman-Stålbrandt, EvaSvärdemo Åberg, Eva

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Edman-Stålbrandt, EvaSvärdemo Åberg, EvaWiik, Anna
By organisation
Department of Education
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 18 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf