System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Future Life Plans and Relationship Formation: A Bidirectional Approach Based on Evidence From Finland
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. Max Planck Institute, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9607-0366
Number of Authors: 32026 (English)In: Journal of Marriage and Family, ISSN 0022-2445, E-ISSN 1741-3737, Vol. 88, no 3, p. 643-658Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective This study examines the prospective and bidirectional association between personal identity processes and relationship formation using longitudinal survey data from Finland.Background Although psychological factors have increasingly been studied as determinants for family formation processes, the role of identity exploration and commitment processes for relationship formation has been underexplored. We show that identity (un)certainty in the domain of future life plans is an important driver for relationship formation, and that relationship status may shape identity (un)certainty in turn.Method We apply event-history analyses in order to study the prospective power of both separate identity processes (variable-centered approach) and clusters of these (person-oriented approach) on relationship formation risks. Furthermore, we conduct fixed effects linear regression models for examining identity development over time based on relationship status.Results Findings suggest that identity uncertainty is negatively, and certainty is positively associated with relationship formation risks over time. Results based on cluster analyses support these findings, that is, committers are more likely to enter a relationship, in particular marriage, than explorers. Mixed findings with regard to identity development over time emerge. Whereas firm identity (i.e., commitment) remains stable over time among partnered individuals, it decreases among singles. However, relationship status does not impact exploration developments.Conclusion Relationship formation decisions in contemporary Finland are intertwined with the (un)certainty of personal identity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2026. Vol. 88, no 3, p. 643-658
Keywords [en]
cohabitation, identity, marriage, relationships
National Category
Sociology (Excluding Social Work, Social Anthropology, Demography and Criminology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-255117DOI: 10.1111/jomf.70037ISI: 001607705700001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-255117DiVA, id: diva2:2058791
Available from: 2026-05-08 Created: 2026-05-08 Last updated: 2026-06-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Peters, Steffen

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Peters, Steffen
By organisation
Department of Sociology
In the same journal
Journal of Marriage and Family
Sociology (Excluding Social Work, Social Anthropology, Demography and Criminology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 49 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf