System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Biodiversity recovery is slow following clear-cut harvest of boreal forests
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 302026 (English)In: Nature Sustainability, E-ISSN 2398-9629Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Boreal forests are important reservoirs of biodiversity, carbon and timber stocks. However, timber harvest can alter biodiversity in these forests without clear evidence on the duration needed for biotic groups to recover. Resilience of boreal forest biodiversity to clear-cut harvest was examined with a meta-analysis of 190 datasets from boreal and hemi-boreal forests of Europe/Russia and North America for arthropods, birds, small mammals, lichens, bryophytes and vascular plants. We modelled similarity of community composition between harvested and unharvested stands versus years post harvest. In approximately half of cases, predicted times for recovery to pre-harvest composition were ≤30 years. In other cases, recovery took much longer or had not occurred within the timeframe of our data; for example, in conifer forest: >100 years (bryophytes), >55 years (small mammals), ~95 years (lichens) and ~85 years (vascular plants). Saproxylic beetles showed no resilience within the 16 (conifer forest) or 29 (mixed forest) years post harvest for which we had data. Recovery generally took longer in conifer and mixed than in broadleaf forests, which always showed either resistance (bryophytes, vascular plants) or resilience with recovery within 12–25 years. Conserving biodiversity in boreal forests will require extended rotations, management for ‘old forest’ structural elements and areas protected from harvesting.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2026.
National Category
Ecology Forest Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-259238DOI: 10.1038/s41893-026-01868-xISI: 001806985800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105043612657OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-259238DiVA, id: diva2:2099341
Note

For correction, see: Nat Sustain (2026) aheadofprint. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-026-01926-4

Available from: 2026-09-08 Created: 2026-09-08 Last updated: 2026-09-08

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hylander, Kristoffer

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hylander, Kristoffer
By organisation
Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences
In the same journal
Nature Sustainability
EcologyForest Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 24 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf