Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What is gender, anyway: a review of the options for operationalising gender
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Cognitive psychology. Lund University, Sweden.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Personality, Social and Developmental Psychology.
Number of Authors: 32021 (English)In: Psychology & Sexuality, ISSN 1941-9899, E-ISSN 1941-9902, Vol. 12, no 4, p. 332-344Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In the social sciences, many quantitative research findings as well as presentations of demographics are related to participants' gender. Most often, gender is represented by a dichotomous variable with the possible responses of woman/man or female/male, although gender is not a binary variable. It is, however, rarely defined what is meant by gender. In this article, we deconstruct the concept 'gender' as consisting of several facets, and argue that the researcher needs to identify relevant aspects of gender in relation to their research question. We make a thorough exposition of considerations that the researcher should bear in mind when formulating questions about each facet, in order to exemplify how complex this construct is. We also remind the researcher that gender is not a binary category and discuss challenges in the balance between taking existing gender diversity into account and yet sorting participants into gender categorisations that function in statistical analyzes. To aid in this process, we provide an empirical example on how gender identity may be categorised when using a free-text response. Lastly, we suggest that other measurements than participants' gender might be better predictors of the outcome variable.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 12, no 4, p. 332-344
Keywords [en]
gender, gender identity, transgender, research methods, cisnormativity
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-180396DOI: 10.1080/19419899.2020.1729844ISI: 000514730400001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-180396DiVA, id: diva2:1420650
Available from: 2020-03-31 Created: 2020-03-31 Last updated: 2022-02-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Lindqvist, AnnaGustafsson Sendén, Marie

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindqvist, AnnaGustafsson Sendén, Marie
By organisation
Cognitive psychologyPersonality, Social and Developmental Psychology
In the same journal
Psychology & Sexuality
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 435 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf