Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Mobile phase and column chemistry selection for high sensitivity non-targeted LC/ESI/HRMS screening of water
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry (MMK).
Stockholm Univ, Dept Environm & Mat Chem, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stockholm Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry (MMK).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9725-3351
Number of Authors: 42023 (English)In: Analytica Chimica Acta, ISSN 0003-2670, E-ISSN 1873-4324, Vol. 1274, article id 341573Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Systematic selection of mobile phase and column chemistry type can be critical for achieving optimal chromatographic separation, high sensitivity, and low detection limits in liquid chromatography electrospray high resolution mass spectrometry (LC/MS). However, the selection process is challenging for non-targeted screening where the compounds of interest are not preselected nor available for method optimization. To provide general guidance, twenty different mobile phase compositions and four columns were compared for the analysis of 78 compounds with a wide range of physicochemical properties (logP range from -1.46 to 5.48), and analyte sensitivity was compared between methods. The pH, additive type, column, and organic modifier had significant effects on the analyte response factors, and acidic mobile phases (e.g. 0.1% formic acid) yielded highest sensitivity. In some cases, the effect was attributable to the difference in organic modifier content at the time of elution, depending on the mobile phase and column chemistry. Based on these findings, 0.1% formic acid, 0.1% ammonia and 5.0 mM ammonium fluoride were further evaluated for their performance in non-targeted LC/ESI/ HRMS analysis of wastewater treatment plan influent and effluent, using a data dependent MS2 acquisition and two different data processing workflows (MS-DIAL, patRoon 2.1) to compare number of detected features and sensitivity. Both data-processing workflows indicated that 0.1% formic acid yielded the highest number of features in full scan spectrum (MS1), as well as the highest number of features that triggered fragmentation spectra (MS2) when dynamic exclusion was used.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. Vol. 1274, article id 341573
Keywords [en]
Identification of unknowns, Method optimization, Data dependent acquisition, Limit of detection, Ionization efficiency
National Category
Analytical Chemistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-220864DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2023.341573ISI: 001029226900001PubMedID: 37455083Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85163880381OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-220864DiVA, id: diva2:1796429
Available from: 2023-09-12 Created: 2023-09-12 Last updated: 2024-08-21Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Machine learning for detection and identification of emerging contaminants with non-targeted LC/ESI/HRMS screening
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Machine learning for detection and identification of emerging contaminants with non-targeted LC/ESI/HRMS screening
2024 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Environmental water analysis remains challenging due to the complexity of the matrix and low concentrations of emerging contaminants. Liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry via an electrospray ionization source (LC/ESI/HRMS) is a powerful technique that offers high sensitivity and selectivity for detecting organic compounds. Therefore, non-targeted screening (NTS) with LC/ESI/HRMS has been widely used to detect and identify emerging contaminants in environmental water samples. Nevertheless, many aspects of detection and identification of unknown LC/ ESI/HRMS features remain challenging due to the large amount of data and lack of many analytical standards.

The main aim of this thesis is to utilize machine learning to improve the detection and identification of emerging contaminants throughout the NTS workflow, starting from sample preparation to reporting the results. In Paper I, different solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges were compared to aid the selection of a suitable SPE cartridge for NTS of environmental water samples. Furthermore, machine learning was used to model the SPE recoveries and the developed model was assessed and validated using an external dataset. Paper II was a study of the impact of mobile phase (pH, organic modifier, additive) and stationary phase on the LC/ESI/HRMS sensitivity towards 78 selected emerging contaminants. The results guided the selection of chromatographic conditions for LC/ESI/HRMS analysis of wastewater samples, where three selected mobile phases were further tested. Paper III describes the impact of mobile phase pH, organic modifier, additive and stationary phase on liquid chromatography retention of 78 selected emerging contaminants. Here I developed a MultiConditionRT model to predict liquid chromatography retention times in four retention mechanisms in combination with two organic modifiers, different pH-s (2.1 to 10.0), and seven additives. MultiConditionRT was validated using internal and external datasets containing 408 new compounds. In Paper IV, a new approach was developed to estimate the limit of detection (LoD) based on predicted ionization efficiency. This approach can be utilized for prioritization of unknown or tentatively identified features and to assess the detectability of chemicals with NTS methods.

Overall, this thesis illustrates how machine learning can be used to improve the detection and identification of emerging contaminants from NTS of environmental waters with LC/ESI/HRMS. In particular, the findings and data presented in this thesis offer valuable insights into the importance of accounting for the analysis conditions while improving the NTS toolbox.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry (MMK), Stockholm University, 2024. p. 65
Keywords
Predictive models, Solid-phase extraction, Limit of detection, Liquid chromatography retention times, Reporting and harmonization of NTS
National Category
Analytical Chemistry
Research subject
Analytical Chemistry
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-232649 (URN)978-91-8014-899-3 (ISBN)978-91-8014-900-6 (ISBN)
Public defence
2024-10-04, Magnélisalen, Kemiska övningslaboratoriet, Svante Arrhenius väg 16B, Stockholm, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-09-11 Created: 2024-08-21 Last updated: 2024-10-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Souihi, AminaKruve, Anneli

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Souihi, AminaKruve, Anneli
By organisation
Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry (MMK)
In the same journal
Analytica Chimica Acta
Analytical Chemistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 59 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf