System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Facilitating Personal Recovery Through Mindfulness-Based Intervention Among People With Mental Illness
Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5358-6867
Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6136-7389
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Clinical psychology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2172-8813
Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 52022 (English)In: Research on social work practice, ISSN 1049-7315, E-ISSN 1552-7581, Vol. 33, no 8, p. 827-848Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: This pre-pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessed a mindfulness-based intervention (MBI, “REMIND1.0”) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Twenty mental health service users were allocated to either 8 weekly mixed-mode MBI (n = 10) or treatment-as-usual (TAU) (n = 10).

Results: There were significant interactions between group and time (baseline T0, post-intervention T1, and 1-month follow-up T2) across all quantitative outcomes (personal recovery, trait mindfulness, self-compassion, resilience, moods, quality of life, and general health). The main themes that emerged from qualitative interviews at T1 are previous experience with MBIs, features of current MBI, and benefits of personal recovery and at T2 are recollection of MBI content, maintaining regular practice after MBI, and retained benefits of personal recovery.

Conclusions: The current MBI is acceptable, feasible, and potentially effective in facilitating personal recovery.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. Vol. 33, no 8, p. 827-848
Keywords [en]
mindfulness, intervention, Covid-19, RCT, MBI, TAU
National Category
Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-222073DOI: 10.1177/10497315221137137Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85143240490OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-222073DiVA, id: diva2:1803322
Available from: 2023-10-09 Created: 2023-10-09 Last updated: 2023-10-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Carlbring, Per

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cheng, Daphne Y. T.Young, Daniel K. W.Carlbring, Per
By organisation
Clinical psychology
In the same journal
Research on social work practice
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 89 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf