Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Scientometric review: Concentration and toxicity assessment in environmental non-targeted LC/HRMS analysis
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry (MMK).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8222-9962
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry (MMK).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0205-7524
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry (MMK). Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Environmental Science. Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry (MMK).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9725-3351
2023 (English)In: Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry, ISSN 2214-1588, Vol. 40, article id e00217Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Non-targeted screening with LC/HRMS is a go-to approach to discover relevant contaminants in environmental water samples that contain an abundance of chemicals. The rapidly increasing popularity of non-targeted LC/ HRMS screening has initiated development of a diverse set of methods for assessing the concentration and toxicity of the detected chemicals. This review aims to benchmark the trends in the environmental NTS literature with particular focus on (1) methods used for the quantification of tentatively identified chemicals that lack analytical standards, (2) methods for assessing the toxicity of detected chemicals, and (3) methods combining the former into a risk evaluation. Here we provide a scientometric review of these strategies based on the Web of Science referenced papers published between 2019 and 2022. General trends show that quantification and toxicity assessments are widely employed in NTS, reaching 66 % and 45 % over four years, respectively. Simultaneously, only 13 % of the papers covered here combine these results into a risk factor or similar. With this review we aim to highlight the advantages and gaps in the approaches used for concentration and toxicity assessment and provide guidelines for more homogeneous data interrogation and extrapolation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. Vol. 40, article id e00217
Keywords [en]
Liquid chromatography, High -resolution mass spectrometry, Toxicity, Quantification, Non -targeted screening, Suspect screening, Risk assessment, Environmental analysis, Effect directed analysis, Semi -quantification
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-224223DOI: 10.1016/j.teac.2023.e00217ISI: 001102329000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85174170811OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-224223DiVA, id: diva2:1817182
Available from: 2023-12-05 Created: 2023-12-05 Last updated: 2023-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Sepman, HelenMalm, LouisePeets, PilleriinKruve, Anneli

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sepman, HelenMalm, LouisePeets, PilleriinKruve, Anneli
By organisation
Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry (MMK)Department of Environmental Science
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 61 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf