Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Among People Recovering from Mental Illness: A Tailored Mindfulness-Based Intervention versus Relaxation Training
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Clinical psychology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2172-8813
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 52024 (English)In: Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, ISSN 2640-8066, E-ISSN 2640-8074, Vol. 21, no 3, p. 318-348Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: This study assessed the potential effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility of a tailored mindfulness-based intervention (MBI, REMIND 2.0) for personal recovery among people with mental illness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: In this pilot mixed methods randomized controlled trial, participants were assigned to either the MBI (n = 14) or the relaxation training (RT) (n = 14). Quantitative measures were used to assess primary outcomes, including personal recovery, mindfulness, self-compassion, resilience, and secondary outcomes, including depression, stress, anxiety, positive and negative moods, quality of life and general health at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1) and one-month follow-up (T2). Quantitative interviews were conducted to explore the experiences and perceptions toward the MBI. Results: Results indicated significant group and time interactions for all outcomes except anxiety and stress. MBI participants showed significant improvements in all outcomes at T1, which were maintained at T2, except for positive mood. RT participants showed a significant decline in resilience but significant improvements in all secondary outcomes at T1, but all outcomes significantly declined at T2, except for anxiety and stress. MBI participants were receptive toward the programme in all aspects of personal recovery. Conclusions: The tailored MBI is a potentially effective, feasible and acceptable approach to facilitate personal recovery among people with mental illness. Differences between MBI and RT are discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 21, no 3, p. 318-348
Keywords [en]
mindfulness, self-compassion, mindfulness-based intervention, relaxation, mental illness, mixed methods
National Category
Sociology Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-224232DOI: 10.1080/26408066.2023.2281418ISI: 001104421100001PubMedID: 37982391Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85177437682OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-224232DiVA, id: diva2:1817220
Available from: 2023-12-05 Created: 2023-12-05 Last updated: 2024-09-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Carlbring, Per

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cheng, Yi Ting DaphneYoung, Kim Wan DanielCarlbring, PerNg, Yat NamHung, Suet Lin Shirley
By organisation
Clinical psychology
In the same journal
Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work
SociologyPsychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 160 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf