Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Closed systems refuting quantum-speed-limit hypotheses
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physics. Karlstad University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1726-4892
Number of Authors: 22023 (English)In: Physical Review A: covering atomic, molecular, and optical physics and quantum information, ISSN 2469-9926, E-ISSN 2469-9934, Vol. 108, no 5, article id 052421Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Many quantum speed limits for isolated systems can be generalized to also apply to closed systems. This is, for example, the case with the well-known Mandelstam-Tamm quantum speed limit. Margolus and Levitin derived an equally well-known and ostensibly related quantum speed limit, and it seems to be widely believed that the Margolus-Levitin quantum speed limit can be similarly generalized to closed systems. However, a recent geometrical examination of this limit reveals that it differs significantly from most known quantum speed limits. In this paper, we show that, contrary to the common belief, the Margolus-Levitin quantum speed limit does not extend to closed systems in an obvious way. More precisely, we show that for every hypothetical bound of Margolus-Levitin type, there are closed systems that evolve with a conserved normalized expected energy between states with any given fidelity in a time shorter than the bound. We also show that for isolated systems, the Mandelstam-Tamm quantum speed limit and a slightly weakened version of this limit that we call the Bhatia-Davies quantum speed limit always saturate simultaneously. Both of these evolution time estimates extend straightforwardly to closed systems. We demonstrate that there are closed systems that saturate the Mandelstam-Tamm but not the Bhatia-Davies quantum speed limit.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. Vol. 108, no 5, article id 052421
National Category
Control Engineering Other Physics Topics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-225657DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.108.052421ISI: 001110853300008Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85178150097OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-225657DiVA, id: diva2:1830001
Available from: 2024-01-22 Created: 2024-01-22 Last updated: 2024-01-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Sönnerborn, Ole

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sönnerborn, Ole
By organisation
Department of Physics
In the same journal
Physical Review A: covering atomic, molecular, and optical physics and quantum information
Control EngineeringOther Physics Topics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 106 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf