Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Motivation and perception of farmers on the benefits and challenges of agroforestry in Sweden (Northern Europe)
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6730-0487
Number of Authors: 32024 (English)In: Agroforestry Systems, ISSN 0167-4366, E-ISSN 1572-9680, Vol. 98, no 4, p. 939-958Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Agroforestry systems provide multiple benefits for human wellbeing and biodiversity; however, their diversity and spatial distribution has sharply declined across Europe. This study focuses on agroforestry farms in Sweden. The aim of the study was to explore farmers' motivations to start agroforestry, what benefits farmers attributed to their agroforestry farms and perceived challenges to practising agroforestry in Sweden. In total, 13 farms that practise various agroforestry forms were selected as case studies. A focus group, semi-structured interviews and field observations were used for data collection. We identified four types of agroforestry systems such as silvopasture, silvoarable, forest farming and forest gardens established on different land such as forested or agricultural land. All studied agroforestry farms were small but had complex spatial and temporal arrangements of crops, trees and animals, which were crucial to generating multiple benefits. Our results show that the multifunctionality of agroforestry systems resulted from farmers' desire to design such systems. Farmers' intentions to get foods and materials from their farms were always intentionally unified with multiple ecosystem services. We argue that agroforestry farmers are designers of multifunctional landscapes, as they deliberately organised their farming activities to get a bundle of ecosystem services belonging to all four categories-provisioning, regulating, supporting and cultural. However, the complexity of agroforestry management, lack of technologies suitable for small-scale agroforestry farms, limited plant materials (including seedlings) and limited knowledge about how to do agroforestry challenged the scaling up of agroforestry practices.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 98, no 4, p. 939-958
Keywords [en]
Agroforestry, Ecosystem services, Farmers' perspective, Multifunctional landscapes
National Category
Forest Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-228120DOI: 10.1007/s10457-024-00964-1ISI: 001187603600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85188149302OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-228120DiVA, id: diva2:1850466
Available from: 2024-04-10 Created: 2024-04-10 Last updated: 2024-04-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Schaffer, Christina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Schaffer, Christina
By organisation
Department of Physical Geography
In the same journal
Agroforestry Systems
Forest Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 165 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf