Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
PFAS Contamination in Europe: Generating Knowledge and Mapping Known and Likely Contamination with “Expert-Reviewed” Journalism
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Environmental Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7035-8660
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 182024 (English)In: Environmental Science and Technology, ISSN 0013-936X, E-ISSN 1520-5851, Vol. 58, no 15, p. 6616-6627Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

While the extent of environmental contamination by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has mobilized considerable efforts around the globe in recent years, publicly available data on PFAS in Europe were very limited. In an unprecedented experiment of “expert-reviewed journalism” involving 29 journalists and seven scientific advisers, a cross-border collaborative project, the “Forever Pollution Project” (FPP), drew on both scientific methods and investigative journalism techniques such as open-source intelligence (OSINT) and freedom of information (FOI) requests to map contamination across Europe, making public data that previously had existed as “unseen science”. The FPP identified 22,934 known contamination sites, including 20 PFAS manufacturing facilities, and 21,426 “presumptive contamination sites”, including 13,745 sites presumably contaminated with fluorinated aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) discharge, 2911 industrial facilities, and 4752 sites related to PFAS-containing waste. Additionally, the FPP identified 231 “known PFAS users”, a new category for sites with an intermediate level of evidence of PFAS use and considered likely to be contamination sources. However, the true extent of contamination in Europe remains significantly underestimated due to a lack of comprehensive geolocation, sampling, and publicly available data. This model of knowledge production and dissemination offers lessons for researchers, policymakers, and journalists about cross-field collaborations and data transparency.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 58, no 15, p. 6616-6627
Keywords [en]
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), PFAS contamination, PFAS testing and investigation, Europe, known PFAS users, expert-reviewed journalism
National Category
Environmental Sciences Media and Communication Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-228888DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c09746ISI: 001196469600001PubMedID: 38569050Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85189539553OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-228888DiVA, id: diva2:1856102
Available from: 2024-05-06 Created: 2024-05-06 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Cousins, Ian

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cousins, Ian
By organisation
Department of Environmental Science
In the same journal
Environmental Science and Technology
Environmental SciencesMedia and Communication Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 196 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf