Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What evidence exists regarding the impact of biodiversity on human health and well-being? A systematic map protocol
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9156-2129
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 62024 (English)In: Environmental Evidence, E-ISSN 2047-2382, Vol. 13, no 1, article id 11Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Global biodiversity is rapidly declining, yet we still do not fully understand the relationships between biodiversity and human health and well-being. As debated, the loss of biodiversity or reduced contact with natural biodiversity may lead to more public health problems, such as an increase in chronic disease. There is a growing body of research that investigates how multiple forms of biodiversity are associated with an increasingly diverse set of human health and well-being outcomes across scales. This protocol describes the intended method to systematically mapping the evidence on the associations between biodiversity from microscopic to planetary scales and human health and well-being from individual to global scales.

Methods We will systematically map secondary studies on the topic by following the Collaborations for Environmental Evidence Guidelines and Standards for Evidence Synthesis in Environment Management. We developed the searching strings to target both well established and rarely studied forms of biodiversity and human health and well-being outcomes in the literature. A pairwise combination search of biodiversity and human health subtopics will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science platform (across four databases) and Scopus with no time restrictions. To improve the screening efficiency in EPPI reviewer, supervised machine learning, such as a bespoke classification model, will be trained and applied at title and abstract screening stage. A consistency check between at least two independent reviewers will be conducted during screening (both title-abstract and full-text) and data extraction process. No critical appraisal will be undertaken in this map. We may use topic modelling (unsupervised machine learning) to cluster the topics as a basis for further statistical and narrative analysis.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 13, no 1, article id 11
Keywords [en]
Biodiversity loss, Ecosystem services, Planetary health, Evidence synthesis, Sustainability
National Category
Reliability and Maintenance Other Computer and Information Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-229063DOI: 10.1186/s13750-024-00335-4ISI: 001209733200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85191692100OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-229063DiVA, id: diva2:1857521
Note

For correction, see: Environ Evid 13, 14 (2024). DOI: 10.1186/s13750-024-00338-1

Available from: 2024-05-14 Created: 2024-05-14 Last updated: 2024-11-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Li, HonghongSøgaard Jørgensen, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Li, HonghongSøgaard Jørgensen, Peter
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Environmental Evidence
Reliability and MaintenanceOther Computer and Information Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 61 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf