Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 62023 (English)In: New Phytologist, ISSN 0028-646X, E-ISSN 1469-8137, Vol. 240, no 2, p. 502-514Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The distribution of roots throughout the soil drives depth-dependent plant-soil interactions and ecosystem processes, particularly in arctic tundra where plant biomass, is predominantly belowground. Vegetation is usually classified from aboveground, but it is unclear whether such classifications are suitable to estimate belowground attributes and their consequences, such as rooting depth distribution and its influence on carbon cycling. center dot We performed a meta-analysis of 55 published arctic rooting depth profiles, testing for differences both between distributions based on aboveground vegetation types (Graminoid, Wetland, Erect-shrub, and Prostrate-shrub tundra) and between ' Root Profile Types ' for which we defined three representative and contrasting clusters. We further analyzed potential impacts of these different rooting depth distributions on rhizosphere priming-induced carbon losses from tundra soils. center dot Rooting depth distribution hardly differed between aboveground vegetation types but varied between Root Profile Types. Accordingly, modelled priming-induced carbon emissions were similar between aboveground vegetation types when they were applied to the entire tundra, but ranged from 7.2 to 17.6 Pg C cumulative emissions until 2100 between individual Root Profile Types. center dot Variations in rooting depth distribution are important for the circumpolar tundra carbonclimate feedback but can currently not be inferred adequately from aboveground vegetation type classifications.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. Vol. 240, no 2, p. 502-514
Keywords [en]
arctic tundra, permafrost, plant-soil interactions, rhizosphere priming effect, root biomass, root vertical distribution strategies, rooting depth
National Category
Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-230174DOI: 10.1111/nph.18998ISI: 000994763700001PubMedID: 37227127Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85160080474OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-230174DiVA, id: diva2:1865261
Available from: 2024-06-04 Created: 2024-06-04 Last updated: 2024-06-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Wild, Birgit

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Keuper, FridaKummu, MattiWild, BirgitWeedon, James T. T.
By organisation
Department of Environmental ScienceThe Bolin Centre for Climate Research (together with KTH & SMHI)
In the same journal
New Phytologist
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 138 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf