Performance Comparison Analysis of ArangoDB, MySQL, and Neo4j: An Experimental Study of Querying Connected Data
Number of Authors: 42024 (English)In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences / [ed] Tung X. Bui, Honolulu, 2024, p. 7760-7769Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]
Choosing and developing performant database solutions helps organizations optimize their operational practices and decision-making. Since graph data is becoming more common, it is crucial to develop and use them in big data with complex relationships with high and consistent performance. However, legacy database technologies such as MySQL are tailored to store relational databases and need to perform more complex queries to retrieve graph data. Previous research has dealt with performance aspects such as CPU and memory usage. In contrast, energy usage and temperature of the servers are lacking. Thus, this paper evaluates and compares state-of-the-art graphs and relational databases from the performance aspects to allow a more informed selection of technologies. Graph-based big data applications benefit from informed selection database technologies for data retrieval and analytics problems. The results show that Neo4j performs faster in querying connected data than MySQL and ArangoDB, and energy, CPU, and memory usage performances are reported in this paper.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Honolulu, 2024. p. 7760-7769
Series
Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, ISSN 1530-1605, E-ISSN 2572-6862
Keywords [en]
Graph Data, Querying Performance, Connected Data, Energy Usage, Performance Benchmark
National Category
Computer Sciences
Research subject
Computer and Systems Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-231316Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85199800629ISBN: 978-0-9981331-7-1 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-231316DiVA, id: diva2:1872811
Conference
57th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2024), Honolulu, USA, January 3-6, 2024
2024-06-182024-06-182025-02-24Bibliographically approved