Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Review of Evaluations of Enterprise Architecture
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3290-2597
Number of Authors: 22024 (English)In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software EngineeringApril 28-29, 2024, in Angers, France: Vol. 1 / [ed] Hermann Kaindl; Mike Mannion; Leszek Maciaszek, SciTePress , 2024, p. 226-237Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The use of information which is useful for collaborating stakeholders has encouraged and enabled businesses to advance. Enterprise architecture (EA) provides frameworks and methods with information products that aim to satisfy stakeholders’ concerns. For positive effects to emerge from using EA, it is necessary, during EA development and evaluation, to examine the work stakeholders do, their practices, how these practices relate to each other, how EA deliverables contribute to stakeholders’ work, and how EA information products are (co)-used in stakeholders practices. This paper presents a systematic literature review on evaluations of EA. The review aims to gain insights related to aspects of EA stakeholder practices and relationships that were considered essential to evaluate and how different stakeholders contributed to evaluations of EA. The insights are intended to inform the design of the Work-oriented Approach (WOA), which aims to enrich EA stakeholder analysis and co-use of E A information products. The results of the survey show an uneven contribution by stakeholders and that stakeholder practices and relationships were not clearly defined and evaluated, leaving uncertainties about whether relevant stakeholders evaluated EA benefits. The lack of stakeholder voices and details provides challenges to the validity of results relating to the organisational benefits of using EA.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
SciTePress , 2024. p. 226-237
Series
Proceedings of the International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering (ENASE), E-ISSN 2184-4895
Keywords [en]
Systematic Literature Review, Stakeholder Analysis, Enterprise Architecture, Evaluation, Work-Oriented Approach, WOA, Relationship, Practice, Information Product
National Category
Information Systems, Social aspects
Research subject
Computer and Systems Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-232104DOI: 10.5220/0012734100003687Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85193971944ISBN: 978-989-758-696-5 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-232104DiVA, id: diva2:1885716
Conference
The 19th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, ENASE, April 28-29, 2024, Angers, France
Available from: 2024-07-24 Created: 2024-07-24 Last updated: 2024-08-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Tell, Anders W.Henkel, Martin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tell, Anders W.Henkel, Martin
By organisation
Department of Computer and Systems Sciences
Information Systems, Social aspects

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 87 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf