Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Interactions of Divers with Reef Biota are More Frequent Among Snorkelers Than Scuba Divers And Increase During Sea Turtle Watching
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1222-2033
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 62023 (English)In: Tourism in Marine Environments, ISSN 1544-273X, E-ISSN 2169-0197, Vol. 17, no 4, p. 249-263Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Snorkeling is a popular recreational activity in shallow water of coastal ecosystems. Because snorkeling is commonly assumed to cause comparatively fewer potential impacts to the marine biota than scuba diving, management is generally focused on the latter. We investigated the behavior of snorkelers aiming to quantify their interactions with benthic reef sessile organisms and sea turtles. We also compared the behavior of snorkelers with scuba divers to assess which group of divers is more damaging to the reef biota. Finally, we compared the use of conventional and nonconventional sampling approaches through analysis of social media images to evaluate the reliability of different approaches to investigate the behavior of underwater recreationists. Snorkelers were observed during 5 min; their interactions with benthic organisms were recorded and compared with scuba diver’s behavior. Snorkelers’observations were carried out with and without the presence of sea turtles and compared with videos from social media. Videos were extracted from YouTube through a search using keywords and analyzed to quantify the number of interactions of divers with the benthic organisms. Snorkelers caused 33% more contacts and 70% more damage to benthic reef organisms than scuba divers. Most interactions were over the zoanthid Palythoa caribaeorum, which received ~80% of contacts and ~30% of damage. The contact rate of snorkelers with benthic organisms increased 5.5-fold when they interacted with sea turtles. Snorkelers sampled through direct observation accounted for more contacts with benthic reef organisms than those observed in social media videos, whereas higher rates of behavioral disturbance to sea turtles were observed in snorkelers sampled in social media videos. As the videos from social media focused on sea turtle watching, they overestimated the amount of snorkelers–sea turtles’ interactions but underestimated the amount of contacts with benthic organisms. Our results revealed that snorkeling in shallow waters <2 m deep may represent a considerable amount of impacts to reef benthic sessile organisms and such impacts significantly increase during sea turtle watching.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. Vol. 17, no 4, p. 249-263
Keywords [en]
Diving impact, Marine protected area, Sea turtle watching, Social media, Southwestern Atlantic, Subtropical reef, Tourism management
National Category
Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-234525DOI: 10.3727/154427322X16710976626847Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85151924499OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-234525DiVA, id: diva2:1906021
Available from: 2024-10-16 Created: 2024-10-16 Last updated: 2024-10-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Eggertsen, Linda

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eggertsen, Linda
By organisation
Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences
In the same journal
Tourism in Marine Environments
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 60 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf