System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Revisiting, selecting, breaking and removing: Incomplete and fragmented Merovingian reopened graves in Western Europe
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Archaeology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1189-9205
Number of Authors: 12023 (English)In: Broken Bodies, Places and Objects: New Perspectives on Fragmentation in Archaeology / [ed] Anna Sörman, Astrid A. Noterman, Markus Fjellström, Routledge, 2023, p. 69-85Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Across early medieval Europe, furnished graves have been regularly found in a disturbed condition, their contents missing or scattered, occasionally broken and thrown into intrusive cuts. Deliberate damage to objects has been suggested, in line with the established idea of violence associated with these post-burial intrusions. However, a close look at the process – type of object broken, sampling of only a few pieces – suggests another reality, challenging the assumption that any break is necessarily the result of a negative intention. Alongside the intentional fragmentation of contents, missing bones characterise a significant number of reopened graves – taphonomy or voluntary destruction during the intrusion are usually proposed as (unsatisfactory) explanations. In fact, this issue has been little considered in the research, and very few in-depth analyses have been carried out so far.

This chapter explores the theme of incomplete and fragmented Merovingian reopened graves, not as a testimony to disrespectful practice but as an integral part of mortuary customs where the dead and their belongings played an active role in the lives of the living. It opens the discussion on the meaning of these specific gestures towards two very different kinds of remains: objects and human bones.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2023. p. 69-85
National Category
Archaeology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-235029DOI: 10.4324/9781003350026-6Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85176562565ISBN: 9781003350026 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-235029DiVA, id: diva2:1909308
Available from: 2024-10-30 Created: 2024-10-30 Last updated: 2024-10-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Noterman, Astrid

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Noterman, Astrid
By organisation
Archaeology
Archaeology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 91 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf