Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exploring the motivation and challenges for land-users engaged in sustainable grazing in Europe
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre. German Centre for integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany; Leipzig University, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2656-0810
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 72024 (English)In: Land use policy, ISSN 0264-8377, E-ISSN 1873-5754, Vol. 141, article id 107146Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Grazing of both domestic and wild large herbivores can contribute to multiple ecosystem services. However, grazing systems strongly differ in the intensity of management and outcomes, and we define sustainable grazing as grazing which benefits multiple environmental ecosystem services. Previous studies have found that, in general, grazing systems with relatively low densities of animals, and with minimal and only targeted applications of deworming and other medicinal treatments, are most sustainable. However, for people engaged in such grazing management, a key question is what are their challenges and motivation.

We conducted interviews with 74 land-users, who are engaged in sustainable grazing management, in eight case-study areas in Europe. Employing the capability, opportunity and motivation-behaviour model (COM-B), we identified key motivation factors driving sustainable grazing management and the challenges which these land-users face. We found that capability and opportunity linked to land abandonment and rural exodus impact upon land-users’ management, especially in parts of South and Eastern Europe. Furthermore, challenges linked to the environment were particularly important in remote areas. In addition, we found economic aspects to be important in driving land-users’ behaviour, especially fiscal measures of the Common Agricultural Policy. Moreover, our results indicate that engagement in sustainable grazing management is often intrinsically motivated by the interest in nature conservation, intergenerational continuity and cohesion in the rural community.

Based on these results, using the Behaviour Change Wheel, we identify key interventions that could facilitate and encourage the capabilities and opportunities to conduct sustainable grazing management. These include incentivising extensification using subsidies, developing direct market possibilities and removing administrative hurdles for practises related to very extensive and semi-wild grazing.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 141, article id 107146
Keywords [en]
Behaviour Change Wheel, Grasslands, Grazing, Land management, Rewilding, Sustainable farming
National Category
Ecology Agricultural Science Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-use
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-235767DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107146ISI: 001289296100001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85189082571OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-235767DiVA, id: diva2:1915851
Available from: 2024-11-25 Created: 2024-11-25 Last updated: 2024-11-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Rouet-Leduc, Juliavon Essen, Erica

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rouet-Leduc, Juliavon Essen, Erica
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Land use policy
EcologyAgricultural ScienceEnvironmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-use

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 36 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf