Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Spatial and temporal habitat use of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in relation to vessel traffic in the Gold Coast Bay, Australia
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences. Griffith University, Australia.
Number of Authors: 22025 (English)In: Marine and Freshwater Research, ISSN 1323-1650, E-ISSN 1448-6059, Vol. 76, no 3, article id MF23164Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Context. Humpback whales utilise coastal habitats for breeding, resting and migration where, at low latitudes, they are often exposed to vessel traffic. The Gold Coast bay (GCB) in south-eastern Queensland, Australia, is utilised by humpback whale mother–calf pairs to rest. Aims. Identify core habitats of pods with and without calves and interception by vessel traffic in the GCB. Method. In total, 4319 whale-sighting records from citizen science-collected data on board whale-watching vessels between 2011 and 2020 were used in this analysis. MaxEnt models were generated to determine species distribution of pods with and without calves. The distribution model was compared with automatic identification system-fitted vessel traffic available from the Australian Maritime Safety Authority over the same time to infer potential vessel impact on these sensitive cohorts. Key results. Habitat use of pods with calves was focused on shallower areas close to shore and overlapped with the core habitat of pods without calves 5 km into the bay. Vessels intercepted up to 80% of the core habitat. Conclusion. Vessel traffic poses a potential threat to humpback whale mother–calf pairs. Implications. An assessment of all vessels leaving the seaway should be considered for the GCB and whale caution zones for vessel traffic.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. Vol. 76, no 3, article id MF23164
Keywords [en]
citizen science, distribution, disturbance, habitat modelling, marine conservation, marine mammals, MaxEnt, resting, vessel traffic, whales
National Category
Zoology Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-242072DOI: 10.1071/MF23164ISI: 001415334300001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85218443532OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-242072DiVA, id: diva2:1951808
Available from: 2025-04-14 Created: 2025-04-14 Last updated: 2025-04-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus
By organisation
Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences
In the same journal
Marine and Freshwater Research
ZoologyEnvironmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 47 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf