System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fusing Fragments: Repaired objects, refitted parts and upcycled pieces in the Late Bronze Age metalwork of Southern Scandinavia
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Archaeology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3796-7066
2024 (English)In: Broken Bodies, Places and Objects: New Perspectives on Fragmentation in Archaeology / [ed] Anna Sörman; Astrid A. Noterman; Markus Fjellström, London: Routledge, 2024, p. 224-242Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Late Bronze Age (LBA) metalwork in southern Scandinavia is often visually striking, meant for various forms of social and ceremonial display. Despite this role, bronze objects sometimes feature indiscrete repairs. Mended and added parts have often been seen as functional solutions to damages caused by accidental breakage or exhaustive wear. However, repairs might also denote meaningful customisations, which change the visual identity and value of the object. Repaired metalwork not only throws light on Bronze Age aesthetics and attitudes towards valuables but also offers insights into the lives of fragments ‘after the break’. This chapter explores different forms of reuse and repair, especially focusing on how fragments or parts were used in modifications. We identify four forms of modifications: fill-ups, fusing, patching and upcycling. From these modifications, we discuss which objects were more prone to modifications and the difference in connotations between breaking (and mending) composite versus solid objects. We also argue that the importance of the casting event could be one explanation for the high amount of imperfections and casting flaws on the metalwork in circulation. This material stimulates wider reflection on fragmentable, ‘partible’ and composite objects and the ways in which different fragments invite reuse.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Routledge, 2024. p. 224-242
Keywords [en]
Late Bronze Age, fragmentation, metalwork, repair, modification, re-use, upcycling
National Category
Archaeology
Research subject
Archaeology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-244256DOI: 10.4324/9781003350026-17Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85176599450ISBN: 9781032394992 (print)ISBN: 9781003350026 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-244256DiVA, id: diva2:1969073
Funder
Berit Wallenberg Foundation, BWS 2019.0051Berit Wallenberg Foundation, BWS 2020.0042Wenner-Gren Foundations, WGF2021-0006Available from: 2025-06-13 Created: 2025-06-13 Last updated: 2025-11-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Sörman, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ojala, KarinSörman, Anna
By organisation
Archaeology
Archaeology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf