Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exploring the role of collocations in language proficiency assessment of heritage language learners: Focus on Russian
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Slavic and Baltic Studies, Finnish, Dutch, and German. University of Helsinki, Finland.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4998-2952
Number of Authors: 32026 (English)In: International Journal of Bilingualism, ISSN 1367-0069, E-ISSN 1756-6878, Vol. 30, no 3, p. 655-671Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aims and objectives: This study investigates the collocational competence of heritage language (HL) speakers and evaluates the feasibility of using automatic assessment to distinguish language proficiency on the collocational levels. We hypothesize that higher collocational scores, associated with the learner texts, indicate more advanced collocational proficiency.

Methodology: The study utilizes t-score metrics to assess the significance of bigrams. The protocol involves calculating the strength of each collocation in a large L1 reference corpus, extracting bigrams from HL data, and comparing them with the L1 data. If a match is found, the HL bigram is assigned the corresponding L1 collocation t-score.

Data and analysis: Research data comprise 118 essays (32,225 tokens) from the National Post-Secondary Russian Essay Contest, USA. The study also utilizes the L1 reference corpus Araneum Russicum and three validation datasets: (a) L1 collocations with the highest t-scores from Araneum Russicum, (b) randomly generated bigrams with low t-scores, and (c) L1 collocations from literary fiction.

Findings: The proposed method is evaluated against three validation datasets and proven to differentiate them adequately. However, the main findings indicate that t-scores do not effectively differentiate proficiency levels among HL learners. The similarity in t-score distributions between HL learner texts and L1 literary texts highlights the challenges of using collocations as a standalone marker of proficiency.

Originality: This study proposes and validates a new method for automatically assessing collocational proficiency. It emphasizes the challenges of using collocations as a definitive marker of HL proficiency but also highlights the benefits of this analysis for L1 language learning and research.

Significance/implications: Automatic collocational analysis shows potential for language proficiency assessment and for developing educational programs to enhance students’ collocational knowledge. By advancing our understanding of collocational patterns and their implications for language use, this study contributes to the development of more effective language assessment tools, fostering greater proficiency and fluency among language learners.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2026. Vol. 30, no 3, p. 655-671
Keywords [en]
automatic assessment, collocations, Heritage learners, proficiency
National Category
Comparative Language Studies and Linguistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-244388DOI: 10.1177/13670069251340263ISI: 001504263500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105007618862OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-244388DiVA, id: diva2:1971311
Available from: 2025-06-17 Created: 2025-06-17 Last updated: 2026-07-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Kopotev, Mikhail

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kopotev, Mikhail
By organisation
Department of Slavic and Baltic Studies, Finnish, Dutch, and German
In the same journal
International Journal of Bilingualism
Comparative Language Studies and Linguistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 73 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf