System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
High-sugar diet leads to loss of beneficial probiotics in housefly larvae guts
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Environmental Science. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7263-8917
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 72024 (English)In: The ISME Journal, ISSN 1751-7362, E-ISSN 1751-7370, Vol. 18, no 1, article id wrae193Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The housefly (Musca domestica) is a common insect species with only a few recurrent bacterial taxa in its gut microbiota, because the numerous microbial acquisition routes in its septic habitats can favor transient microbes. Here, we investigated the role of the diet on the microbiota and the developmental success of a housefly strain reared on three substrates. We used a control wheat bran-based substrate, and added clotted cream and sucrose to make a high-fat, and a high-sugar substrate, respectively. The conducted survey revealed that, in contrast to the high-fat diet, the high-sugar diet caused lower developmental success and less diverse microbiota, in which several lactobacilli were replaced with Weissella bacterial phylotypes. Cultures with sucrose as the sole carbon source confirmed that a Weissella confusa strain, isolated from larvae, could utilize sucrose more efficiently than other tested lactic acid bacteria; a result also supported by gene function prediction analysis. Enhancing the rearing substrate with Limosilactobacillus fermentum and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains, which were isolated from control larvae, could not only revert the negative effect of the high-sucrose diet on development, but also increase the gut bacterial diversity. In our study, we show that the microbiota shifts in response to the high-sucrose diet did not benefit the host, that showed lower developmental success. In contrast, high-sucrose favored specific components of the microbiota, that continued to be enriched even after multiple generations, outcompeting beneficial bacteria. Also, microbiome manipulation showed the potential of probiotics to rescue host performance and restore the microbiome.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 18, no 1, article id wrae193
Keywords [en]
housefly, microbiota, probiotics, high-sugar diet
National Category
Microbiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-249460DOI: 10.1093/ismejo/wrae193ISI: 001337825600001PubMedID: 39361901Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85207600147OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-249460DiVA, id: diva2:2013283
Available from: 2025-11-12 Created: 2025-11-12 Last updated: 2025-11-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Rijkers, Ruud

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rijkers, Ruud
By organisation
Department of Environmental Science
In the same journal
The ISME Journal
Microbiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 34 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf