Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
If the Yedoma thaws, will we notice? Quantifying detection limits of top-down methane monitoring infrastructures
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography. Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, The Bolin Centre for Climate Research (together with KTH & SMHI). Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Germany; Goddard Space Flight Center, USA.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0858-8227
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 52025 (English)In: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, ISSN 1867-1381, E-ISSN 1867-8548, Vol. 18, no 22, p. 7053-7073Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Large quantities of carbon are stored in Yedoma permafrost. When temperatures rise, its high ice content is a catalyst for rapid degradation, which in turn may cause the release of large quantities of carbon. 40 % to 70 % of the radiative forcing from this release is expected to be in the form of CH4. In this observing system simulation experiment, we examined the capabilities of three atmospheric GHG monitoring platforms i.e. tall towers, and the TROPOMI and MERLIN satellite instruments, to detect changes in CH4 release from increased Yedoma thaw. A set of environments are simulated with the GEOS-5 model: one representing a “natural” emission case as the reference, a second featuring enhanced CH4 release from Yedoma soils. From within these modelled environments, synthetic measurements are generated following best in situ practices and realistic error characterizations.

For the satellites we find the lowest detection limits when aggregating measurements over a 112 d period, at Yedoma fluxes of 144 % to 367 % of current conditions. These factors are up to 1.2 times higher when taking transport modelling uncertainties into account. The tall tower network shows a wide range of detection lower limits, the lowest at only 107 % of current fluxes, but has considerably higher lower detection limits when factoring in transport modelling errors. Overall, the individual systems appear to lack the ability to detect and attribute small changes in Yedoma CH4 fluxes, and would either need to be used in combination or require a considerable time to detect changes under higher emission scenarios.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. Vol. 18, no 22, p. 7053-7073
National Category
Earth Observation
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-251136DOI: 10.5194/amt-18-7053-2025ISI: 001624838800001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105023364454OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-251136DiVA, id: diva2:2029858
Available from: 2026-01-19 Created: 2026-01-19 Last updated: 2026-01-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Pallandt, Martijn M. T. A.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pallandt, Martijn M. T. A.
By organisation
Department of Physical GeographyThe Bolin Centre for Climate Research (together with KTH & SMHI)
In the same journal
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Earth Observation

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 11 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf