Change search
Refine search result
1 - 26 of 26
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Bergman, Helena
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of History.
    Engwall, Kristina
    Gunnarsson-Östling, Ulrika
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    What about the Future? The Troubled Relationship between Futures and Feminism2014In: NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, ISSN 0803-8740, E-ISSN 1502-394X, Vol. 22, no 1, p. 63-69Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This position paper argues that issues related to the future are worth emphasizing and discussing with more feminist fervour and engagement than is now the case within feminist studies and futures studies. It is concluded that feminists cannot just be critical from an outside perspective, but must engage in creating alternative futures. These futures should not be common goals around which to unite, but a way to inspire feminist thinking about different futures. The authors point out the problem that the futures studies field lacks feminist perspectives, and in this position paper they discuss the gap between futures studies and feminism.

  • 2. Borrelli, Lisa Maria
    et al.
    Hedlund, Daniel
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Work.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Lindberg, Annika
    Border Bureaucracies: A Literature Review of Discretion in Migration Control2023Report (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This literature review summarizes findings from 63 articles published between 2001 and 2020 that study discretion of frontline workers at migration control. The results demonstrate that discretionary practices in various migration control situations (e.g., border zones, migration agencies, courts, public welfare services, and detention centers) are widespread but share common patterns. Frontline workers’ racialized prejudices and perceptions of migrant deservingness were the most dominant patterns found in the data, although there were some disagreements about which were most influential. Discretion of frontline workers was described as foremost detrimental to migrants, as itamplified the migrants’ vulnerable situations, even if it occasionally could increase individual migrants’ room for agency and strategic maneuvering. Contrary to the assumption underpinning the control gap-thesis in immigration policy literature that governments’ capacity to control migration is hampered by the significant discretion at the frontlines, many studies in our sample describe how governments shape the discretionary practices of frontline workers through informal, subtle, and opaque governing strategies. These informal governing strategies enable central governments to deflect responsibility for discriminatory and inhumane policy outcomes. 

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 3.
    Gustafsson, Maria-Therese
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Betydelsen av etnografi för studiet av politik2016In: Introduktion till politisk etnografi: metoder för statsvetare / [ed] Maria-Therese Gustafsson, Livia Johannesson, Malmö: Gleerups Utbildning AB, 2016, p. 13-42Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 4.
    Gustafsson, Maria-Therese
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Johannesson, LiviaStockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Introduktion till politisk etnografi: metoder för statsvetare2016Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Politisk etnografi har alltmer kommit att betraktas som en oumbärlig metod inom statsvetenskapen. Utgångspunkten för den politiska etnografin är att människors uppfattning om sin egen sociala och politiska verklighet är helt central för att vi ska kunna förstå och förklara politiska fenomen. Med sin utgångspunkt i människors upplevelser och vardagsliv ger metoden ovärderliga insikter om vad politik och makt faktiskt är.

    Introduktion till politisk etnografi är den första svenska läroboken i ämnet. Boken introducerar metoden och redogör för dess historiska rötter och möjligheter inom statsvetenskapen. Författarna har på olika sätt anammat ett politiskt-etnografiskt förhållningssätt och visar här hur sådana studier kan bedrivas. Deras forskning spänner över vitt skilda områden, från antifeministiska rörelser på nätet till handläggare på Arbetsförmedlingen och ex-kombattanter i Colombia, och ger därmed smakprov på hur politisk etnografi används inom statsvetenskapen i dag. I och med att texten visar hur centrala samhällsvetenskapliga problemställningar har hanterats med hjälp av politisk etnografi får studenterna konkreta redskap för att tillämpa politisk etnografiska arbetssätt i självständiga projekt, som uppsatser, examensarbeten, utvärderingar och rapporter.

  • 5.
    Gustafsson, Maria-Therese
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Politisk-etnografiska forskningsstrategier2016In: Introduktion till politisk etnografi: metoder för statsvetare / [ed] Maria-Therese Gustafsson, Livia Johannesson, Malmö: Gleerups Utbildning AB, 2016, p. 145-163Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 6.
    Hedlund, Daniel
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Work.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Editorial Introduction: The Role of Language and Communication in Asylum Procedures2023In: Journal of International Migration and Integration, ISSN 1488-3473, E-ISSN 1874-6365, Vol. 24, p. 717-726Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 7.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Access to Interviewees or Access in Interviews2017Other (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    When researchers request access to interviewees, what exactly is it they want? Is it their authentic opinions and values, their discursive strategies or their performative identities? And what part of themselves are interviewees willing to share with researchers?

  • 8.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    En fråga om ansvar: Demokratiska mekanismer för ansvarsutkrävande och ansvarsflykt i megaprojekt2021In: Megaprojekt: Kritiska perspektiv på storskalig infrastruktur / [ed] Gabriella Körling, Susann Baez Ullberg, Svenska sällskapet för antropologi och geografi , 2021, p. 23-46-Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 9.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Exploring the “Liberal Paradox” from the Inside: Evidence from the Swedish Migration Courts2018In: The international migration review, ISSN 0197-9183, E-ISSN 1747-7379, Vol. 52, no 4, p. 1162-1185Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Courts are influential actors during the implementation of immigration policies in liberal democracies. The “liberal paradox” thesis stipulates that courts are driven by logics that hamper restrictionist immigration policies. This study contributes to this theory by exploring the norm construction of impartiality among judicial workers in Swedish migration courts when deciding asylum appeals. Its findings contradict the liberal paradox assumption that courts act according to inner logics that benefit immigrants’ rights. At Sweden’s migration courts, judicial workers show impartiality by using a skeptical approach to asylum applicants and do so to distance themselves from the political discourse of generosity that has dominated Swedish political debate for decades. The broader implications of these findings are that immigration policy theories can benefit from qualitative research exploring informal norm constructions in courts, as such work can offer new insights about the role of courts in the implementation of immigration policies.

  • 10.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    In Courts We Trust: Administrative Justice in Swedish Migration Courts2017Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The research problem this dissertation addresses is how judicial practices generate administrative justice in asylum determination procedures. Previous research on immigration policies argues that when asylum determinations are processed in courts, principles of administrative justice are ensured and immigrants’ rights protected. In this dissertation, I challenge that argument by approaching administrative justice as an empirical phenomenon open for different types of interpretations. Instead of assuming that administrative justice characterizes courts, I assume that this concept acquires particular meanings through the practices of the courts. Empirically, this dissertation studies practices of assessing asylum claims at the Swedish migration courts. The migration courts are the result of a major reform of the Swedish asylum procedure that took place in 2006, with the motive to end inhumane rejections of asylum seekers by enhancing administrative justice in the asylum process. By interviewing and observing judges at the migration courts, litigators from the Migration Board and public counsels from different law firms, this interpretive and ethnographic study analyzes how administrative justice acquires meanings in the daily practices of assessing asylum claims at the migration courts.

    The main result is that a ceremonial version of administrative justice is generated at the migration courts. This version of administrative justice forefronts symbolic dimensions of justice. The asylum appeal procedure succeeds in communicating justice through rituals, building design and metaphors, which emphasize objectivity, impartiality and certainty on behalf of the judicial practices. However, these symbols of justice disguise several unfair aspects of the asylum appeal procedure, such as inequality in resources and trustworthiness between the state’s representative and the asylum applicants as well as the uncertainty inherent in both the factual and the credibility assessment of asylum claims. The implications of these findings are that immigration policy research needs to reconsider the relationship between the courts and immigrants’ rights by paying more attention to the everyday practices of ensuing administrative justice in courts than on the instances when courts oppose political attempts to restrict immigrants’ rights.

    Download full text (pdf)
    In Courts We Trust
    Download (jpg)
    Omslagsframsida
  • 11.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Inför lagen ska alla helst vara olika2021In: Svenska dagbladet, ISSN 1101-2412, p. 32-32Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 12.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Just another benefit? Administrative judges’ constructions of sameness and difference in asylum adjudications2022In: Citizenship Studies, ISSN 1362-1025, E-ISSN 1469-3593, Vol. 26, no 7, p. 910-926Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This ethnographic study examines how Swedish administrative judges apply the principle of treating like cases the same and unlike cases differently when adjudicating asylum claims. The findings suggest that judges construct asylum claims like citizens’ claims for welfare benefits and unlike protection claims made by citizens. Drawing on Hannah Arendt’s critique of the state-centric foundation of contemporary human rights framework, I demonstrate that the Swedish asylum procedure is structured according to a similar state-centric foundation. Therefore, it reinforces injustices that exist between those who belong to a political community and those who stand outside that community asking to be let in. This study contributes to previous research on asylum adjudication by shedding light on structural injustices embedded within legal practices rather than searching for explanations in extra-legal factors. The implication of this approach is that it makes visible a paradox: that judges’ commitment to procedural justice principles can perpetuate structural injustices.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 13.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Migrationsdomstolarna har ökat rättsosäkerheten2017In: Dagens nyheter, ISSN 1101-2447, no 28 oktoberArticle in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 14.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Performing Credibility: Assessments of Asylum Claims in Swedish Migration Courts2012In: Retfærd. Nordisk Juridisk Tidsskrift, ISSN 0105-1121, Vol. 35, no 3/138, p. 69-84Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    This article explores how adjudicators justify the rejection of an asylum application, by the practice of assessing credibility. This is done by analyzing written decisions from the migration courts in Sweden. By applying an intersectional theoretical approach which emphasizes the performative aspects of identities, it is argued that the court decisions constitute important sites for the formation, subversion and rejection of identities. The analysis reveals that the formal judicial criteria for assessing credibility are not the only tools that are used by the adjudicators. In addition, informal presumptions about how gender, education, culture and religion determine individual asylum applicants’ behavior play significant roles for the outcomes of the credibility assessments. The article suggests that the way in which these presumptions are articulated in the decisions indicates that they actively limit the possibilities for unique or deviant asylum narratives to get recognized as credible in the court procedure.

  • 15.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Scandinavian exceptionalism: yesterdays’ utopia can become tomorrows’ dystopia2023Other (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 16.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Silence and Voice in Oral Hearings: Spatial, Temporal, and Relational Conditions for Communication in Asylum and Compulsory Care Hearings2023In: Social and Legal Studies, ISSN 0964-6639, E-ISSN 1461-7390, Vol. 32, no 3, p. 399-419Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The legal right to be heard by a judge is an important human right. However, what happens if a claimant does not meet the requirements of legal communication when given the opportunity to be heard in court? In this article, I address this question by exploring how temporal, spatial, and relational conditions encourage or silence vulnerable claimants’ voices in asylum hearings and compulsory psychiatric care hearings in Swedish administrative courts. In addition, I analyze the multiple functions orality has when judges make decisions in these case types. The results provide nuance to claims in previous studies about the importance of enough time, spaces that signal solemnity, and flexibility in judges’ approaches to vulnerable claimants’ voices by demonstrating how these conditions interact with each other and generate different communicative atmospheres. Moreover, this study challenges the idea that oral hearings are necessarily beneficial for claimants as it demonstrates that under certain conditions orality can place claimants at a disadvantage and amplify their defenselessness. However, orality brings legitimacy to court proceedings even in these cases as it communicates justice to the public evaluating these procedures from a distance.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 17.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    The Symbolic Life of Courts: How Judicial Language, Actions, and Objects Legitimize Credibility Assessments of Asylum Appeals2023In: Journal of International Migration and Integration, ISSN 1488-3473, E-ISSN 1874-6365, Vol. 24, p. 791-809Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Asylum determinations are highly complex and difficult decisions. At the heart of this decision lies a credibility assessment of the asylum claimant’s narrative, which confronts the decision-maker with a seemingly straightforward question: do I believe this person’s story? To uphold legitimacy of this assessment, semi-legal criteria have been established internationally. However, these criteria have been criticized for relying on inaccurate and simplistic assumptions about human behavior, autobiographical memory, and communication. In light of this contestation, I ask how the legal-administrative practice of assessing credibility of asylum applications gains legitimacy in the eyes of the public, policy-makers, and legal professionals despite resting on highly disputable assumptions? To answer this question, I draw on interviews, observations, and written judgements from the Swedish administrative courts to explore how symbolic messages are tacitly conveyed through the use of judicial language, activities, and objects. The analysis suggests that cohesive, albeit tacit, messages about credibility assessments being accurate (rather than arbitrary), objective (rather than subjective), professional (rather than lay), and just (rather than unjust) are produced to both near and distant audiences. The study contributes to the literature on credibility assessments by offering a theoretical perspective that can unpack the relationship between symbolic communication in courts and perceived legitimacy for disputed practices within asylum determinations and migration control.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 18.
    Johannesson, Livia
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Lindberg, Annika
    Är asylrättens dagar räknade?2020In: Svenska Dagbladet, ISSN 1101-2412Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 19.
    Johannesson, Livia
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Qvist, Martin
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Navigating the policy stream: Contested solutions and organizational strategies of policy entrepreneurship2020In: International Review of Public Policy, ISSN 2679-3873, Vol. 2, no 1, p. 5-23Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In the Multiple Streams Framework (MSF), policy entrepreneurs are primarily defined by their ability to promote and seek support for policy solutions. Recent research, however, points to the importance of policy entrepreneurs as “arena shapers” who attempt to create favorable conditions for their solutions in conflictual policy settings. In this paper, we seek to incorporate such strategies into the MSF by drawing on the organizational foundations of the original garbage can model. The main question is what role do policy entrepreneurs play in “organizing out” opposition from pre-decision processes, as a way of advancing contested policy solutions. We answer this question in a case study of a controversial hospital “mega-project” in Stockholm healthcare that shows how a small but influential team of entrepreneurs used the project as an opportunity for policy change. The study helps to identify three different organizational strategies: 1) regulating participation in order to neutralize opponents: 2) specializing attention to limit the “searchlight” and 3) sequential attention in order to reduce complexity and build commitment. While effective for advancing solutions in the face of conflict and entrenched positions, organizational strategies also have important democratic implications for the legitimacy of pre-decision processes and the prospects for broad deliberation.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 20.
    Johannesson, Livia
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Smas, Lukas
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Human Geography.
    Idén om att bygga framtidens sjukhus2021In: Megaprojektet Nya Karolinska Solna: Beslutsprocesserna bakom en sjukvårdsreform / [ed] Maria Grafström, Martin Qvist, Göran Sundström, Makadam Förlag, 2021, p. 102-117Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 21.
    Johannesson, Livia
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Weinryb, Noomi
    How to blame and make a difference: Perceived responsibility and policy consequences in two Swedish pro-migrant campaigns2021In: Policy sciences, ISSN 0032-2687, E-ISSN 1573-0891, Vol. 54, no 1, p. 41-62Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In this paper, we explore the assumption that blame-attribution can be an effective rhetorical strategy for non-elite interest groups who want power holders to be attentive to their demands. Through a qualitative analysis of two pro-migrant campaigns led by grassroot activists in Sweden, one taking place in 2005 and the other in 2017, we offer a nuanced empirical examination of non-elite initiated blame-games. We show how perceived responsibility influences these blame-games, and explore which policy consequences might emanate from them. We demonstrate that blame-making, under certain conditions, can be a successful strategy to gain policy influence, but that this strategy is conditioned by the complexity and transparency of the institutional arrangements of accountability within the policy sector. The focus on non-elite blame-making in order to change policies enables us to contribute to the theoretical discussion on the relationship between anticipatory and reactive forms of blame-avoidance behaviours, and to discuss the democratic implications of blame-games in both shorter and longer time perspectives. One implication of this study is that successful non-elite blame-making at one point in time actually can lower the chances of successful blame-making in the future.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 22.
    Johannesson, Livia
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Weinryb, Noomi
    Juridifiering till priset av försvårad styrning inom asylprövningen2019In: Granskningssamhället: Offentliga verksamheter under lupp / [ed] Bengt Jacobsson, Jon Pierre, Göran Sundström, Lund: Studentlitteratur AB, 2019, p. 187-207Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 23.
    Johannesson, Livia
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Yngfalk, Carl
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Privatiserad sjukvård 2.0 - offentlig-privat samverkan i fallet Nya Karolinska Solna2020In: Organisation och samhälle - Svensk företagsekonomisk tidskrift, ISSN 2001-9114, no 1, p. 22-28Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 24.
    Johannesson, Livia
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Yngfalk, Carl
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Tilläggsavtal och anpassning: Det institutionella (efter)arbetet för att upprätthålla OPS-avtalets legitimitet inom Stockholms läns landsting 2012–20182020Report (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Den här rapporten redovisar resultat från en studie om hur OPS-avtalet hanterades och utvecklades inom landstingsförvaltningen efter nedläggningen av NKS-förvaltningen år 2012 och fram till 2018, året för invigningen av sjukhuset. Mer specifikt undersöker rapporten hur legitimitet skapades och upprätthölls för den nya projektorganisationen som skapades kring OPS-avtalet under perioden, och därigenom för OPS-avtalet som sådant. Utöver det diskuterar rapporten även implikationerna av detta legitimeringsarbete för demokratiskt beslutsfattande inom landstinget.

    Rapporten bygger på diskussioner om legitimitet och institutionellt arbete inom den nyinstitutionella teoribildningen och en analys av policydokument samt semistrukturerade intervjuer med 14 nyckelpersoner som arbetade med OPS-avtalet under denna tidsperiod. Rapporten tar sin utgångspunkt i att det skedde stora förändringar i den institutionella omgivningen runt år 2012, som medförde att nya krav ställdes på projektorganisationen runt OPS-avtalet från dess institutionella omgivning. Dessa nya förväntningar bestod bland annat i att OPS-avtalet från och med denna tidpunkt inte längre skulle betraktas som något unikt och annorlunda i landstinget, utan i stället integreras, som ett avtal bland många andra, i den övriga verksamheten. I rapporten identifieras fyra huvudsakliga hanteringsstrategier som användes för att försöka upprätthålla legitimitet för projektorganisationen kring OPS-avtalet, och därmed även för själva avtalet.

    Den första strategin handlade om att justera och anpassa OPS-avtalet utifrån Karolinskas nya position och ökade inflytande över verksamhetsinnehållet. Detta kom till uttryck genom ett antal tilläggsavtal. Tilläggsavtalen syftade till att förändra och justera OPS-avtalet och tjänade därmed indirekt de politiska intressen inom landstinget som förespråkade de marknadsmässiga ideal som ursprungligen låg till grund för beslutet att använda OPS-modellen. Den andra strategin för att legitimera OPS-avtalet och den projektorganisation som skapades kring avtalet var att tydliggöra och i ökad grad formalisera ansvarsfördelningen mellan parterna. Den tredje strategin handlade om hur projektorganisationen både formellt och under mer informella former distanserade sig från tidigare beslut om NKS. Den fjärde strategin handlade om att projektorganisationen inom landstinget än mer konsekvent än tidigare framhävde, förädlade och tillämpade OPS-avtalets idé om att offentliga aktörer ska agera som beställare av funktionalitet och tjänster och inte som beställare av lösningar (såsom en ny sjukhusbyggnad).

    Utefter dessa strategier visar och diskuterar rapporten hur de marknadsorienterade idéer som ligger till grund för OPS-modellen framhävdes i organisationen och fick utrymme i landstingets förvaltning på ett mer generellt plan bortom NKS-projektet. Flera demokratiska implikationer framhävs, bland annat hur idén med denna typ av (funktions)upphandlingar är att externa aktörer anses vara bättre lämpade att formulera lösningar på problem som en organisation upplever än de personer som till vardags arbetar i organisationen. I fallet med sjukvårdsorganisationer leder detta till att makt och inflytande flyttas längre bort från de vårdgivande professionerna och närmare de privata aktörer som kontrakteras i funktionsupphandlingar. Avslutningsvis konstaterar rapporten att överlåtandet av utarbetandet av lösningar på behov inom offentlig verksamhet till privata företag försvagar de demokratiska mekanismerna för ansvarsutkrävande. I litteraturen om OPS har ansvarsutkrävande beskrivits som ett av de demokratiska dilemman som följer av uppluckrade gränser mellan offentlig och privat verksamhet. Ett demokratiskt system bygger på att medborgarna kan utkräva ansvar för de beslut som deras valda representanter har fattat. OPS leder till att det blir en oklar ansvarsfördelning mellan den offentliga verksamheten och de privata aktörer som ingår i samarbetet.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 25.
    Qvist, Martin
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Ett megaprojekt tar form: Den tidiga planeringen av Nya Karolinska Solna2018Report (Other academic)
    Abstract [sv]

    Detta är en delrapport i forskningsprojektet ”Framtidens universitetssjukhus: beslut om Nya Karolinska Solna”, finansierat av Stockholms läns landsting. Rapporten redovisar resultat från en studie av processerna bakom beslutet om att bygga Nya Karolinska Solna och fokuserar därmed på perioden från initiering och inledande planering av NKS-projektet fram till det formella beslutet togs 2008.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 26.
    Sundström, Göran
    et al.
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
    Johannesson, Livia
    Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
    Hur kontrollerades beslutsfattandet?2021In: Megaprojektet Nya Karolinska Solna: Beslutsprocesserna bakom en sjukvårdsreform / [ed] Maria Grafström; Martin Qvist; Göran Sundström, Göteborg; Stockholm: Makadam Förlag, 2021, p. 282-303Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
1 - 26 of 26
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf